Decode over 200 jewelry stamps including 925, 750, 14K, GP, GF, PVD, and S316L to understand metal purity, coatings, and hallmark trust levels.
Published:
November 3, 2026
Author:
Yi Cui
Hallmarking began as consumer protection. Buyers needed a way to know whether a yellow ring was actually gold alloy and whether a silvery tray was actually silver. Over time, systems added a responsible maker, a fineness number, an assay-office mark, and sometimes a date. The word “hallmark” itself comes from Goldsmiths’ Hall in London. [13]
The important distinction is this: some marks are independently tested and legally applied by an authorized body. Others are applied by a manufacturer, distributor, or factory and are only as reliable as the party behind them. A third group is simply commercial shorthand for a finish, a material grade, or a marketing claim.
Most shoppers assume that any stamp means certified purity. That is not how the United States works. The FTC Jewelry Guides police misleading descriptions of gold, silver, plating, and platinum, but they do not create a federal, mandatory third-party assay-office system for ordinary commercial jewelry. U.S. fineness marks are usually maker-applied claims, with accuracy and trademark requirements when markings are used. In contrast, a qualifying UK precious-metal item must carry a complete hallmark applied through an authorized assay office. [1] [2] [5] [6]
That does not make U.S. 14K or 925 markings worthless. It means the buyer should ask a different question: who stands behind the mark, and can the metal be verified? At Branvas, when we source materials for private-label collections, one of the first things we verify is whether a factory mark is legally meaningful in the destination market, because it affects how the product can be described and sold.

The Branvas Hallmark Trust Index™ is Branvas’s four-tier framework for judging what a jewelry stamp can reasonably tell you. It separates independent verification from legal claims, common trade shorthand, and pure marketing.
| Trust Tier | Label | Definition | Example Stamps |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 | Legally Verified | Independently assayed and marked by an authorized assay body or under the Common Control Mark system | Complete UK assay-office marks, Convention CCM combinations |
| Tier 2 | Legally Regulated (Self-Declared) | A maker-backed claim that must be accurate when used under applicable law, but does not normally require third-party assay before sale | U.S. 925, 14K, 18K, 750; Italian legal fineness plus registered identification mark |
| Tier 3 | Industry Convention | Widely understood shorthand whose abbreviation alone does not provide independent purity verification | GP, GEP, S316L, PVD, IP |
| Tier 4 | Marketing / Unverifiable | No universal, independently testable definition in the stamp alone | “Surgical steel,” “hypoallergenic,” “gold tone” |
Use the index to set your confidence level, not to price an item by itself. Tier 1 is the strongest paper trail. Tier 2 can be fully legitimate, but it calls for seller accountability or testing. Tier 3 and Tier 4 claims need a specification sheet, composition disclosure, or lab result before they support a premium price.
One nuance matters: an Italian star-number-province mark is a registered maker identification mark, not automatically an independent assay result. An Italian item can reach Tier 1 when it bears a qualifying independent Convention or assay-office marking; the maker code by itself belongs in Tier 2. [8] [9]
We often see aspiring brand founders list products with Tier 3 or Tier 4 language without realizing that FTC-compliant descriptions require specific qualifiers, which is why we build material disclosure into every Branvas product sheet.

This is the core reference. Read a numeric stamp as parts per thousand unless it is plainly a karat mark, then look for the metal name, responsible maker, and country-specific companion marks. “Legal status” refers to the Branvas Hallmark Trust Index™, not a universal legal verdict. A number alone never proves origin, weight, coating thickness, or authenticity.
| Stamp | Full Name | Metal | Purity % | Common Region(s) | Legal Status | Red Flags / Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 999 | Fine metal, context required | Silver or gold | 99.9% | Global | T2 | Confirm whether the item claims silver or gold; the number alone does not identify metal. |
| 999.9 / 9999 | Four-nines fine gold | Gold | 99.99% | Global bullion markets | T2 | Common on bars, unusual for wearable jewelry; number alone is not an exchange certification. |
| 958 | Britannia silver | Silver | 95.8% | UK, Commonwealth | T1 in complete UK hallmark | A fineness number alone is not a full UK hallmark. |
| 925 / S925 / Sterling | Sterling silver | Silver | 92.5% | Global | T2, T1 only in full UK hallmark | Fakes exist. In the UK, look for sponsor, fineness, and assay-office marks. |
| 900 | Coin silver | Silver | 90.0% | U.S., Europe, antiques | T2 | “Coin silver” has a defined 900/1000 meaning under FTC guidance. [4] |
| 835 | 835 silver | Silver | 83.5% | Germany, Netherlands, vintage Europe | T2 | A real fineness format, but region and maker still matter. |
| 830 | 830 silver | Silver | 83.0% | Scandinavia, Europe | T2 | Often found on older regional silverware and jewelry. |
| 800 | Continental silver | Silver | 80.0% | Europe, Middle East, antiques | T2 | Common on older German and Italian work; not sterling. |
| 750 / Au750 / G750 | 18K gold | Gold | 75.0% | EU, global | T2, T1 in qualifying assay system | Direct 18K equivalent. “Au” or “G” may identify gold in some national systems. |
| 18K / 18Kt / 18CT | 18 karat gold | Gold | 75.0% | U.S., UK, global | T2 | Same fineness as 750. Check for a responsible maker mark in U.S. commerce. |
| 916 / 22K | 22 karat gold | Gold | 91.6% | Asia, Middle East, global | T2 | High gold content but alloy and solder areas can differ. |
| 875 / 21K | 21 karat gold | Gold | 87.5% | Middle East, Europe | T2 | Numeric or karat format can be regional. |
| 833 / 20K | 20 karat gold | Gold | 83.3% | Europe, vintage pieces | T2 | Less common modern retail format. |
| 585 / Au585 / G585 | 14K gold | Gold | 58.5% | EU, global | T2 | Direct 14K equivalent. |
| 583 | Historic 14K-equivalent fineness | Gold | 58.3% | Former Soviet market, vintage | T2 | Near 585, but do not silently represent it as 585 without testing. |
| 14K / 14Kt / 14CT | 14 karat gold | Gold | 58.5% nominal | U.S., global | T2 | Same target fineness as 585; the applicable U.S. tolerance is expressed in parts per thousand. [1] |
| 14KP / 14K P | Plumb 14K gold | Gold | At least stated fineness, subject to law | U.S. | T2 | “P” means plumb, not plated. It signals the marked minimum, not a coating. |
| 417 / 10K | 10 karat gold | Gold | 41.7% | U.S., EU | T2 | 10K is the National Stamping Act’s minimum quality standard; FTC examples also recognize accurately qualified 9K descriptions. [1] |
| 375 / 9K | 9 karat gold | Gold | 37.5% | UK, Australia, Europe | T1 in complete UK hallmark; T2 otherwise | Valid UK fineness. Do not assume every U.S. seller can use an unqualified quality mark under the Stamping Act. |
| 333 / 8K | 8 karat gold | Gold | 33.3% | Germany, parts of Europe | T2 | Below many countries’ common jewelry standards. Check local naming rules. |
| 24K / 24Kt | Pure-gold description | Gold | Theoretical 100%, practical jewelry varies | Global | T2 | Jewelry is often marked 999 instead because 24K is soft. |
| Pt / Plat / PT950 | Platinum designation | Platinum | Varies; PT950 is 95% Pt | Global | T2 | “Pt” alone does not state a fineness. U.S. rules require composition-sensitive qualification. [2] |
| 950Pt / 900Pt / 850Pt | Platinum fineness | Platinum | 95% / 90% / 85% | Global | T2, T1 in assay system | Read the number with the Pt mark, not as gold or silver. |
| Pd / Pall / 950Pd | Palladium designation | Palladium | Varies; 950Pd is 95% | Europe, global | T2 | Palladium is a distinct platinum-group metal, not platinum. |
| 500Pd | 500 palladium | Palladium | 50.0% | Convention markets | T2 | Verify local recognition and the accompanying metal designation. |
| GP | Gold plated | Base metal plus gold layer | Not stated by GP | Global | T3 | No universal micron value. FTC use requires accurate karat qualification and reasonable durability. [1] |
| GEP / GE | Gold electroplate | Base metal plus gold layer | Not stated by abbreviation | U.S., global | T3 | The full FTC term has minimum fineness, thickness, and durability conditions. [1] |
| HGE / HEG | Heavy gold electroplate | Base metal plus gold layer | Not stated by abbreviation | U.S., global | T2 claim / T3 shorthand | FTC guidance defines “heavy” electroplate at 2.5 microns equivalent fine gold, not merely marketing. [1] |
| GF / 1/20 14K GF | Gold filled | Base metal plus mechanically bonded gold | At least 1/20 of metal weight | U.S., global | T2 | Must show karat. Gold filled is not ordinary thin plating. [1] |
| RGP / 1/40 12K RGP | Rolled gold plate | Base metal plus mechanically bonded gold | Fraction must be disclosed | U.S., global | T2 | FTC example uses 1/40. It can be thinner than GF but still mechanically bonded. [1] |
| Gold overlay | Gold overlay | Base metal plus mechanically bonded gold | Fraction dependent | U.S., global | T2 | Check fraction and karat. Do not assume “overlay” means GF. |
| Vermeil / 925 + gold disclosure | Gold vermeil | Sterling silver plus gold | 925 silver base; minimum coating rule | U.S., global | T2 | Must be sterling, at least 10K gold, and 2.5 microns equivalent fine gold. [3] |
| GS / GV | Seller shorthand for a claimed gold-vermeil item | Claimed sterling silver plus gold | Not stated by abbreviation | Global | T3 | “GS” and “GV” are not universal legal abbreviations; verify that the actual vermeil claim meets the FTC specification. [3] |
| Gold tone / gold color | Color description | Base metal | None stated | Global | T4 | Not a gold-content claim and not a fineness mark. |
| EPNS | Electroplated nickel silver | Nickel-silver alloy plus silver plate | None stated | UK, vintage global | T3 | “Nickel silver” contains no required silver; this is plated ware, not sterling. |
| SS / Stainless | Stainless steel | Steel alloy | N/A | Global | T3 | Grade is unspecified. Stainless is not a precious-metal stamp. |
| 316L | Low-carbon Type 316 stainless steel | Steel alloy | N/A | Global | T3 | A grade claim, not a purity claim. “Medical grade” is marketing unless a specification supports it. |
| S316L | Stainless steel 316L | Steel alloy | N/A | Global, factory use | T3 | Usually a formatting variation of 316L, not a hallmark system. |
| INOX | Stainless or rust-resistant steel | Steel alloy | N/A | France, Italy, EU | T3 | “Inox” means stainless/rust-resistant; it does not name the grade. |
| Ti / TITA | Titanium | Titanium or titanium alloy | N/A | Global | T3 | Lightweight material claim. Alloy and surface finish remain unspecified. |
| PVD | Physical vapor deposition coating | Coated base metal | N/A | Global | T3 | Coating process only. Look separately for the substrate, such as S316L. |
| IP | Ion plating | Coated base metal | N/A | Global | T3 | Process name, not gold fineness or coating thickness. |
| DLC | Diamond-like carbon coating | Coated base metal | N/A | Global | T3 | Hard black coating. It says nothing by itself about the base metal. |
| AL / ALUM | Aluminum | Aluminum alloy | N/A | Global | T3 | Lightweight base metal, sometimes confused with silver color. |
| NF | “Nickel free” claim | Varies | N/A | Global | T4 | No universal mark definition. Ask for nickel-release compliance where relevant. |
| NP | Often “nickel plated” or a seller code | Varies | N/A | Global | T4 | Not a reliable universal abbreviation. Confirm from the seller. |
| CZ | Cubic zirconia | Stone, not metal | N/A | Global | T3 | Gemstone disclosure only. It says nothing about the mounting. |
| 925 + CZ | Sterling silver with cubic zirconia | Silver plus stone | 92.5% silver claim | Global | T2 for silver claim | The CZ portion is not a metal purity stamp. |
| Lion passant | Traditional sterling symbol | Silver | 92.5% when used in UK hallmark | UK | T1 only with complete UK marks | Optional traditional fineness symbol, not an assay-office mark by itself. [5] |
| Anchor | Birmingham Assay Office mark | Precious metals | Varies | UK | T1 in complete hallmark | Should appear with sponsor and fineness marks. |
| Leopard’s head | London Assay Office mark | Precious metals | Varies | UK | T1 in complete hallmark | Assay-office symbol, not a generic “English” mark. |
| Rose | Sheffield Assay Office mark | Precious metals | Varies | UK | T1 in complete hallmark | Must be read as part of a set. |
| Castle | Edinburgh Assay Office mark | Precious metals | Varies | UK | T1 in complete hallmark | Must be read as part of a set. |
| Date letter | UK date identifier | N/A | N/A | UK | T1 only with complete hallmark | Optional under the modern UK hallmark. Do not date an item from a letter alone. [5] |
| CCM | Common Control Mark | Gold, silver, platinum, palladium | Varies | Convention states | T1 with required companion marks | International voluntary mark applied after approved control. [8] |
| 585 + ★ number + AR | Italian fineness plus identification mark | Gold | 58.5% claim | Italy | T2 | Star, registered number, and province identify the responsible maker. It is not a crown or a stand-alone assay mark. [9] |
| 750 ITALY / 14K ITALY | Country and fineness statement | Gold | 75% / 58.5% claim | Italy, export market | T2 | “Italy” does not replace a registered identification mark or testing. |
| Au750 / 18K Gold + maker code | Chinese domestic format | Gold | 75.0% | China | T2 | GB 11887 calls for manufacturer code, material, and fineness for domestic-market precious-metal jewelry. [10] |
| CN + code | Claimed Chinese factory/export code | Varies | N/A | Export market | T3 | No universal Chinese purity meaning. It may identify a seller or factory only. |
| TH + code | Claimed Thai factory/export code | Varies | N/A | Export market | T3 | No verified national, universal purity definition. Ask for certificates and testing. |

In the United States, the central rule is truthful representation, not mandatory federal hallmarks. The FTC Jewelry Guides say it is unfair or deceptive to misrepresent gold content, karat fineness, plating thickness, weight ratio, or application method. If a seller uses “gold” for an alloy, the karat must immediately qualify the claim. Plated goods must be described as plated, not as solid gold. [1]
The FTC’s consumer guidance adds a practical buying signal: a karat mark should sit near the name or U.S. registered trademark of the company that stands behind it. Not every gold or silver item must be stamped, but a mark creates a claim that has to be supportable. There is no U.S. counterpart to the UK requirement that a qualifying piece be sent to a government-authorized assay office before sale. [2] [13]
Be careful with the often-repeated “half-karat tolerance” claim. The cited FTC rule points instead to the National Stamping Act: for gold items without solder, the permitted negative tolerance is three parts per thousand; where the tested part contains solder, it is seven parts per thousand. The legal treatment of a particular product can be more nuanced than a social-media shorthand suggests. [1]
For sellers, this is a complaint-driven and evidence-driven environment. Keep supplier specifications, invoices, test reports, product photography, and the identity of the party behind each stamp. A 14K impression by itself is not an independent laboratory result.
The UK Hallmarking Act 1973 creates a different model. If an item over the relevant weight is sold or described as gold, silver, platinum, or palladium, it must carry a legally recognized hallmark unless an exemption applies. The thresholds are 1g for gold, 7.78g for silver, 0.5g for platinum, and 1g for palladium. Selling a qualifying item without the proper hallmark is an offence. [5] [6]
A complete modern UK hallmark has three compulsory elements: a registered sponsor’s mark, a fineness mark in parts per thousand, and an assay-office mark. The date letter and traditional pictorial symbols are optional. That is why a lone “925” or lion passant is not a complete UK hallmark, even though it may be a useful clue. [5]
The four offices are London, marked by a leopard’s head; Birmingham, an anchor; Sheffield, a rose; and Edinburgh, a castle. They test items before applying approved marks, and manufacturers or importers cannot apply those approved assay marks themselves. [7]
The current Trading Standards guidance, reviewed in 2025, reports no major change to this core three-mark structure. The practical takeaway is simple: in the UK, a complete hallmark is powerful evidence of an independently tested precious-metal item, not merely a factory declaration. [6]
Europe commonly communicates precious-metal purity in millesimal fineness, or parts per thousand. That makes 585 easy to decode as 58.5% gold, 750 as 75.0% gold, and 925 as 92.5% silver. The figures translate cleanly to karat gold: 585 is 14K and 750 is 18K. Still, a number is a fineness format, not proof of a single EU-wide testing process.
The EU does not operate one unitary hallmarking system. National systems differ, and recognition rules differ with the destination country. The most useful cross-border framework is the International Convention on the Control and Marking of Articles of Precious Metals. A Common Control Mark, applied by a designated assay office after approved testing, can be accepted by Convention states without fresh testing when the item qualifies for their domestic market. [8]
The Convention recognizes several finenesses, with Pt 950, Au 750, Au 585, Ag 925, and Ag 800 legal standards in every contracting state. The CCM itself is voluntary. That makes it stronger than a bare number, but it does not mean every 750 item circulating in Europe has a CCM. [8]
For buyers, start with the number, then identify the metal, maker, country, and any assay or Convention symbol. For sellers, never treat “EU stamp” as a substitute for checking the law where the item is actually offered for sale.
Italy’s precious-metal regime combines legal fineness markings with a registered identification system. The Ministry of Enterprises and Made in Italy states that precious-metal alloys must bear their fineness in thousandths and an identification mark made under the governing rules. Chambers of Commerce keep registers for the assignees of these marks. [9]
The familiar Italian identification mark is a five-point star, a registered number, and a province abbreviation, such as ★ 123 AR for a registered party in Arezzo. It tells you which responsible maker or business registered the mark. It should be read beside the fineness, such as 585 or 750, rather than as a purity number itself.
A common overstatement is that every Italian star-number code is an official third-party assay stamp. It is not. Italy’s Convention profile describes its control system as voluntary, while its national rules still require legal fineness and identification marks for covered precious-metal goods. Independent confidence rises when the item also carries a Common Control Mark and its companion responsibility and assay-office marks. [8] [9]
That distinction is why Italian marks remain valuable without being magic. A registered code can create traceability. An independently applied assay or CCM mark adds third-party verification. A country name stamped on a clasp adds much less.
Factory and export markings need the most context. China has a formal domestic precious-metal jewelry standard, GB 11887-2012. Its marking rules cover a manufacturer code, material, and fineness, and its example formats an 18K item with a company code, material designation, fineness, and diamond weight where applicable. In other words, a legitimate domestic Chinese precious-metal mark can carry meaningful composition information. [10]
That is different from treating CN followed by a code as a universal purity certification. There is no universal “CN factory code” that independently proves metal content. It may identify a factory, supplier, or export batch, but it does not replace a composition specification or test report.
The same caution applies to alleged Thai factory formats such as TH plus a number. We did not find an authoritative national rule that makes that pattern a universal Thai purity hallmark. Thailand has precious-metal testing capability, but an export factory code should be treated as traceability information until the supplier supplies a specification, test result, or certification.
When Branvas works with manufacturing partners in Asia, we require third-party material testing documentation independent of any factory stamp, because a factory code tells you who made it, not what it’s made of. For private-label work, ask for the declared base metal, coating process, coating thickness when claimed, nickel and restricted-substance documents for the sales market, and a sample test plan.

Say you’re choosing between four yellow-gold necklaces at the same price point. Here’s how to decode what you’re actually getting:
| Type | Stamp Example | Base Metal | Gold Content | Durability | FTC Disclosure Required? | Approximate Longevity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solid 14K Gold | 14K or 585 | Gold alloy throughout | 58.5% gold throughout | Highest | Yes, fineness must be accurate | Potentially lifetime with repair and care |
| Gold Filled | 1/20 14K GF | Usually brass or other base metal | At least 5% of total metal weight, mechanically bonded | High | Yes, karat and qualifying term/fraction | Often years to decades, use-dependent |
| Gold Vermeil | Vermeil, or 925 plus accurate gold disclosure | Sterling silver | Sterling base, at least 10K gold, 2.5 microns equivalent fine gold | Medium to high | Yes, must meet FTC vermeil specification | Often years, wear-dependent |
| Gold Plated | Accurate karat plus GP or GEP | Brass or base metal | Surface layer only; GP does not state a universal thickness | Low to medium | Yes, must be clearly qualified as plated | Months to years, thickness and wear dependent |
| Gold Tone / Gold Color | None, or “gold tone” | Base metal | No stated gold content | Low | Cannot imply actual gold content | Cosmetic finish life varies |
Solid 14K gold means the usable metal of the item is a 14-karat alloy, not a gold film over a base metal. It is usually the best choice for long-term wear, but hollow construction is still possible and should be disclosed. The stamp says fineness, not weight or construction. [1]
Gold filled uses a mechanically bonded gold-alloy layer. The term has a concrete FTC threshold: the layer must be at least 1/20 of the metal weight of the entire article, and the gold fineness must be stated. That is why 1/20 14K GF is a more informative mark than GF alone. [1]
Gold vermeil is gold over sterling silver, not gold over brass. FTC guidance requires a sterling base, gold of at least 10K, coverage on all significant surfaces, reasonable durability, and a 2.5-micron minimum equivalent fine-gold thickness. A seller calling gold-over-brass “vermeil” is using the term inaccurately. [3]
Gold plated can be a legitimate description, but it says far less about how long the item will look new. GP does not communicate a universal thickness. If a marketer uses the FTC’s “gold electroplate” terminology, the rule specifies a minimum equivalent thickness of 0.175 microns of fine gold and other conditions; “heavy gold electroplate” has the 2.5-micron threshold. [1]
Gold tone describes color only. It may be attractive and affordable, but it should not be presented as precious-metal jewelry.
Gold Filled does not equal Gold Plated. The first is a mechanically bonded layer with a weight-ratio requirement. The second is a surface coating claim whose meaningful details are process, karat, thickness, coverage, and durability. Under FTC guidance, sellers cannot use “gold” without qualification for an alloy or coating that is not fine gold, and terms such as gold plated, gold filled, and gold electroplated must be used accurately. [1]

Use the magnet test as a warning screen. Gold, silver, and platinum are not strongly magnetic. A strong pull can indicate a base-metal component, but a non-magnetic result does not authenticate jewelry because many counterfeiting metals are also non-magnetic.
Use an acid test carefully. Proper karat acid kits compare the reaction of a rubbed test streak with known solutions. They can be useful for a trained jeweler, but they involve hazardous chemicals and can be fooled by heavy plating or unusual construction.
Ask for XRF screening. X-ray fluorescence is a non-destructive technique that identifies elemental composition. It is the practical gold standard, pun intended, for fast retail screening, but surface-sensitive results should be interpreted by a qualified operator when an item may be plated, filled, hollow, soldered, or layered. [11] [12]
Check hallmark consistency. A UK hallmark should have its complete compulsory set: sponsor, fineness, and assay-office mark. A single 925, a lion passant, or a random date letter is not a complete modern UK hallmark. [5]
Compare weight and feel. Precious metals have recognizable densities. A remarkably light “solid” piece, especially one with an oversized visual profile, may be hollow or base metal. Weight alone does not prove fraud, but it is a reason to inspect construction.
Inspect wear points. Clasps, ring edges, chain links, and the back of pendants reveal coating wear first. A different-colored base metal beneath a gold-colored surface points to plating, not necessarily wrongdoing, if the item was accurately sold as plated.
Examine the stamp itself. Genuine-looking marks are usually crisp, consistent, and placed where the construction permits. Blurry, irregular, poorly spaced, or obviously post-sale impressions deserve skepticism. A neat font still is not scientific proof.
Treat “surgical steel” as a question, not an answer. It is not a universal legally defined jewelry grade. Ask for the exact alloy, such as 316L, and remember that a grade claim does not by itself establish nickel release or skin compatibility.
We review factory samples with XRF testing before approving materials for any Branvas private-label collection, because our brand partners are selling under their own name, and material accuracy is non-negotiable.

Many newer stamps describe surface treatments, not metal purity. That distinction matters because a very durable finish can sit over inexpensive base metal, and a precious-metal item can also carry a protective finish.
PVD, or physical vapor deposition, is a vacuum deposition process that applies a thin ceramic or metallic coating. It is often used to create gold, black, or rose-gold color on steel. A PVD finish can be durable and color-stable when the preparation, coating chemistry, and thickness are good, but PVD Gold does not disclose what is under the coating.
IP, or ion plating, is commonly used as a related coating description. It refers to an ion-assisted deposition process designed to improve adhesion. It is common in watches and fashion jewelry, but it is not a karat, a fineness number, or a guarantee that the product is solid gold.
DLC, or diamond-like carbon, is a hard carbon-based coating often associated with black finishes and wear resistance. Like PVD and IP, it describes the surface treatment rather than the core metal.
The useful pattern is a two-part disclosure, such as S316L PVD. That tells you the claimed base-metal grade and the claimed coating process. It still does not tell you coating thickness, gold content, or whether the product meets a particular nickel-release rule. Ask for those details when they matter.

For a seller or brand builder, the safe habit is to describe the physical product, not the mood board. If the item is 14K gold alloy throughout, say 14K gold and make sure the claim is accurate. If it is gold plated, identify it as plated and state the karat quality of the applied alloy where the FTC rule requires it. If it is gold filled or vermeil, use the terms only when the construction meets the FTC conditions. [1] [3]
Do not use an unqualified “gold jewelry” label for GP, GEP, PVD-gold steel, or gold-tone products. The FTC Guides treat misrepresenting gold content, plating thickness, weight ratio, and method of application as deceptive. Keep your bills of materials, metal certificates, test reports, and approved product copy aligned so that the stamp, product title, listing bullets, and packaging all say the same thing. [1]
The commercial risk is broader than an FTC complaint. Amazon, Etsy, and other marketplaces can correct, suppress, or delist inaccurate material descriptions under their policies, and customer complaints can produce returns, chargebacks, and reputation damage. A factory’s product photo is not enough evidence for a precious-metal claim.
If you’re building a jewelry brand and want to make sure every product description is FTC-safe from day one, Branvas builds compliant material disclosures into every product sheet. Learn how Branvas works → You can also explore the Branvas Academy for practical brand-building guidance.

925 means the item is represented as sterling silver, an alloy containing 925 parts per thousand, or 92.5%, pure silver. In the U.S., it is generally a maker-backed quality claim that must be accurate when used. In the UK, 925 can be the fineness component of a complete independently applied hallmark, but the number alone is not the full hallmark. [4] [5]
Yes. Genuine 925 sterling is real silver alloyed with other metals, usually copper, to improve strength. Pure 999 silver is softer, which is why it is less common for everyday jewelry. The stamp alone is not proof of authenticity, so assess the seller, the companion marks, construction, and testing if the item’s value justifies it. [2] [4]
750 means 750 parts per thousand, or 75.0%, pure gold. It is the millesimal equivalent of 18K gold because 18 of 24 parts are gold. You will often see 750 in Europe and global jewelry trade, sometimes alongside Au750 or a maker mark. The number says fineness, not that a specific assay office verified the item.
GP means gold plated and does not, by itself, communicate a universal coating thickness. GF means gold filled, a mechanically bonded gold layer. Under FTC guidance, gold filled requires the gold layer to account for at least 1/20 of the total metal weight and to be identified with its karat quality, so it is generally a more substantial construction. [1]
Cross-reference the number against a known fineness, then check whether its companion marks make sense for the claimed country. A complete UK hallmark contains sponsor, fineness, and assay-office marks. Use a magnet only as a screen, then ask a reputable jeweler for acid testing or XRF. Buy from sellers that disclose material construction and can support their claims. [5] [11]
Launching a jewelry line should not mean guessing whether 925, S316L, GP, or 750 is safe to put in a product title. When materials are unclear, you risk customer complaints, listing problems, and costly rework after packaging is printed. Branvas is a private-label jewelry Brand-as-a-Service built to remove that uncertainty. We handle sourcing, branding, packaging, and blind fulfillment while building material transparency into the product information your business uses to sell. You get a clearer path from factory sample to product page, with descriptions your customers can understand and your brand can stand behind. Explore Branvas’s catalog and launch a jewelry brand with materials you can describe accurately and sell with confidence. See the Branvas catalog → Whether you are a creator, ecommerce or boutique-store owner, or aspiring entrepreneur, start with materials you can verify.
